Hypocrisy and confusion distort the debate on social mobility

Blog post only

If you think the public debate on taxes often misses some of the points, you should pay attention to debates on migration and social mobility. Those discussions tap into people’s fears and aspirations, but routinely miss the real economic undercurrents. This Martin Wolf column from 2019 (Hypocrisy and confusion distort the debate on social mobility (ft.com)) was an eye opener for me at the time. We tend to think of life outcomes in terms of efforts and there is some basic recognition that access to opportunity matter. But looked at a global level, economic currents create opportunities and, in particular, a demand for certain jobs.

Since the Second World War, there has been a rising demand of ’managerial and professional jobs’ (from 11% all the way to 40%). By necessity, those jobs were filled with people who had different social backgrounds. Education had very little to do with that upward social mobility. But the growth has stagnated and may even reverse. And that implies that there’ll be downward social mobility, something people have a very adverse reaction to in their personal life. Even in a stable economy, every upward social mobility implies downward social mobility.

Social mobility still has a meritocratic positive note to it and on a first principles basis, it still looks preferable (not least because of the positive impact on social cohesion and people’s aspirations). But the meritocratic tone misses that the bandwidth is determined by global economic factors which are beyond people’s control.

Wolf notes we should focus on the economy if we care about social mobility and he’s right. But even here, there is a limit to how much an individual country can do. All developed countries (and even developing ones) seem to want to attract on high innovation businesses that require an educated workforce, which means the limits of that strategy might be reached too. So, here too, social mobility seems an outcome to respond to rather than something that can proactively be pushed upwards.

Obvious disclaimers: this is not advice. These views are my own and do not necessarily represent my employer.



3 responses to “Hypocrisy and confusion distort the debate on social mobility”

  1. [Insert here] delenda est Avatar
    [Insert here] delenda est

    Hi,

    Very interesting, but surprisingly (to me!) negative take. It appears to me that there are lots of pretty low-hanging fruit in nearly all countries, and undoubtedly in all EU countries, to improve on nearly all factors that might contribute to social mobility, including the specific one you focused on of attracting innovative high-growth businesses.

    Things that spring to mind:

    1. even mere tweaks to labor market regulation;
    2. any attempt at all to align the tax system to incentivise work;
    3. cutting even only a hundred of the thousands of regulatory barriers;
    4. teaching maths and literacy to disadvantaged kids even when they are not intrinsically motivated

    That’s before we even get into fundamental reform of the tax system, zoning, building, education and labour law.

    Like

    1. There are many benefits to upward social mobility but if 40% of the labour market is already in professional and managerial roles, it seems there’s limited scope for increasing upward social mobility (unless offset by downward social mobility). An increase in R&D activities might – if successful – increase productivity (and thereby raise standard of living) but that doesn’t necessarily increase social mobility too: will it mean it will require an even greater portion of the workforce to have professional jobs?

      Most of the other reforms mentioned focus on labour supply again whereas Wolf’s point is that labour demand is a much stronger indicator of social mobility (but one that’s harder to plan for).

      Like

      1. [Insert here] delenda est Avatar
        [Insert here] delenda est

        I think that there is a lot of room for upwards mobility both into and within what are “professional and managerial roles”!

        And I thought that my points were about increasing demand 🙂

        Like

Leave a comment

About Me

I am Leonard, an experienced M&A Tax and International Tax expert. I write about tax on LinkedIn and Twitter sometimes (but mostly LinkedIn). People liked the posts, but there were too many of them to keep track of. So, now they are on a blog for future reference.

Obvious disclaimers on all my posts: this is not advice. These views are my own and do not necessarily represent my employer.

LINks

LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leendertwagenaar/

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started